Talk:Sycamore Historic District

Sycamore Historic District was one of the Art and architecture good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 7, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
November 21, 2009	Good article reassessment	Kept
January 25, 2025	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois High‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article

This needs to be reassessed. I liked the format, its something I thought I would try for the historic district. I started a similar thing with the Woodstock Square Historic District, albeit with less information. The main articles that link from here will be expanded soon and some of them are already pretty decent. Any help is appreciated, just please, please, please use inline citations. Thank you and Happy Editing! A mcmurray 21:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Passed

This article has passed the GA noms, to improve the article and prepare it for WP:FAC I would suggest that the article is given a copyedit as well as an A-class peer review. Tarret 13:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Sycamore Historic District/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:51, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I am happy for this article to keep its GA status and found no problems with it. Good work. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sycamore Historic District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060831104919/http://dig.lib.niu.edu/dekalb/hist-court.html to http://dig.lib.niu.edu/dekalb/hist-court.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria due to uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Is anyone interested in addressing this concern, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 19:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Sycamore Historic District

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:21, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article has many uncited statements, including several sections. Z1720 (talk) 18:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article

GA Passed

GA Reassessment

Checking against GA criteria

External links modified

GA concerns

GA Reassessment

Sycamore Historic District

zproxy.org